Role of SRS in nuclear waste solutions to be studied

Tuesday, June 5, 2012 5:57 PM
Last updated 11:23 PM
  • Follow Latest News

A study will explore Savannah River Site’s potential role in devising disposal solutions for spent nuclear fuel.

“We want to look at everything, from cradle to grave, involving the nuclear fuel cycle, even things we may not even know about,” said Rick McLeod, the executive director of the SRS Community Reuse Organization.

The CRO, a multicounty economic development consortium, is financing the $200,000 study, to be conducted by Timothy A. Frazier, a senior adviser to the Washington, D.C., firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP.

Spent fuel is stored at the nation’s 104 nuclear power plants, including Plant Vogtle near Augusta. The nationwide inventory of 75,000 tons could expand to 150,000 tons by 2050, not including spent fuel from new reactors.

The long-term plan was to bury both commercial and radioactive defense wastes in a deep repository in Nevada’s Yucca Mountain – a project halted by the Obama administration.

Frazier served as the designated federal officer for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, empaneled to explore disposal options for closing the nuclear fuel cycle in the wake of the Yucca Mountain decision.

The five-county region that includes SRS could have a viable role in finding those solutions, McLeod said, but the study will at least offer a first glimpse into both the opportunities and the challenges.

“This is the next step toward seeking a broad community consensus about this important issue,” he said.

In a final report unveiled last January, the Blue Ribbon Commission concluded that a deep geologic repository remains essential to nuclear waste disposal and suggested interim storage sites could safely and temporarily be used to store the materials.

The panel also said a system in which the federal government forces nuclear waste on communities where it is not wanted is a no-win situation, and urged a more cooperative siting process that involves communities who are supportive of spent fuel projects.

Gauging community impacts, and public sentiment, are parts of the study that will focus on SRS and the surrounding communities, McLeod said.

“Current community interest in this topic stems, in part, from recent recommendations by the President’s Blue Ribbon Commission,” McLeod said. “Included in the recommendations is a call for a consent-based approach related the nuclear fuel cycle that would be built on agreement and support by an informed community.”

Clint Wolfe, the executive director of Citizens for Nuclear Technology Awareness, a pro-nuclear group, said the area is a logical candidate for involvement in nuclear waste solutions, partly because its nuclear history spans six decades.

“SRS already stores and will process spent nuclear fuel from domestic and foreign research reactors,” Wolfe said. “Our region is centrally located in the Southeast where many commercial nuclear power plants are located, including the first four to be licensed as part of the nuclear renaissance.”

The study, which could consider interim storage, reprocessing or doing nothing at all, is just the first step in a lengthy process, McLeod said. The study will be completed in 2013.

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
SCEagle Eye
927
Points
SCEagle Eye 06/05/12 - 09:05 pm
2
0
South Carolina isn't going to

South Carolina isn't going to take kindly to efforts to dump highly radioactive spent fuel on us and then reprocess it to remove plutonium. Oh what a nuclear mess reprocessing makes! We've done our share of dealing with nuclear waste so won't bite on this crazy scheme which a few will get rich off of.

Clean Water
11
Points
Clean Water 06/06/12 - 08:13 am
2
1
History

If you look at the history of South Carolina, you will see that South Carolina will do just about anything for a few dollars. South Carolina is home to many maga dumps. States ship millions of tons of garage to the Palmetto State. South Carolina is the home of the infamous Barnwell Nuclear Dump. Other States have dump there nuclear garage on South Carolina for years. DHEC and many of South Carolina politicians have sold South Carolina out. There is no thought for tomorrow. South Carolina must stop the greed for our children's sake and the sake of the itself.

Reindeargirl
49
Points
Reindeargirl 06/06/12 - 01:26 pm
1
0
We will not be the replacement for Yucca Mountain

There is no such thing as interim storage. . . .whatever comes here will stay here forever. . ..hundreds of thousands of years, slowly seeping into the aquifers and soil. S.C is finished being the nuclear waste dumping ground of the nation. Keep the spent fuel at the reactors in dry cask storage and get busy finding the next permanent repository. . .. . IF any state will step up and take it. . . .. .Hint: WE WON'T.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs