NRC mulls license change for Vogtle nuclear expansion

  • Follow Latest News

Southern Co. wants to amend its Plant Vogtle construction license after unforeseen settling of soil beneath the foundation for its new Unit 3 reactor created an uneven surface.

In a letter to the U.S. Nuclear regulatory Commission, dated March 30 and made public last week, the company said the concrete “mudmat” that lies atop compacted, load-bearing soil “is not as level as expected.”

The mudmat is the surface upon which the concrete “basemat” is to be built, after which nuclear buildings will be erected. The structures help protect against seismic damage.

The current license allows only a 1-inch variability in the levelness of the basemat, and the amendment would increase that leeway to 4 inches and allow engineers to use more concrete when the basemat is poured to ensure a level surface for the “nuclear island” buildings.

In the letter to the NRC, Southern Co. Regulatory Affairs Director Chuck Pierce wrote that the change will not affect safety standards for the new units and asked that pouring of basemat concrete – scheduled to commence in mid-June — be allowed to continue even if the license amendment remains under review.

Delaying such a determination, he added, “could result in an additional delay in the construction of the nuclear island basemat structure and subsequent construction activities that are dependent upon the completion of the basemat structure.”

The $14 billion project to add two new reactors calls for completion of Unit 3 in 2016 and Unit 4 in 2017. About 2,200 workers are employed at the Burke County construction site.

Steve Higginbottom, a Southern Co. spokesman, said the license amendment request is necessary because it involves a change in the design basis for the new AP1000 reactor. Although four of the units are under construction in China, the Vogtle project is the first site in the U.S. where the new reactors are being built.

“We anticipate the NRC will act in a very timely manner on our preliminary amendment request, and we don’t expect any delays based on this request,” he said.

The company has already filed notices of 32 license amendment requests it will file by 2014.

Environmental groups critical of the Vogtle expansion contend the foundation issue and other planned amendments to be sought could create delays and inflate the costs of the project.

Jim Warren, of the North Carolina Waste Awareness & Reduction Network, said federal regulators are obligated to thoroughly evaluate requested changes.

“The NRC simply cannot skip any steps in reviewing this fundamental safety issue just to accommodate the construction schedule, and a public hearing on the design change is warranted,” he said, in a press release.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Little Lamb
Little Lamb 04/11/12 - 02:10 pm
From the

From the article:

Environmental groups critical of the Vogtle expansion contend the foundation issue and other planned amendments to be sought could create delays and inflate the costs of the project.

You know, you would assume that environmental groups would attack the project based on harm to the environment. Instead, they are worried about financing. Why not let the anti-poverty lobby take care of worrying about people's pocketbooks and let the environmental groups go do a census of endangered turtles?

debbiep38 04/11/12 - 08:59 pm
Does this mean Southern

Does this mean Southern Company's rate decrease will be rescinded?

IndianaJones 04/12/12 - 09:50 am
This is not an uncommon

This is not an uncommon concern in this area. However, this article is limited on the technical meat of the issue. Was the settlement within expectation? Which issue is the root cause?
• Immediate Settlement (sand and clay)
Occurs as the load is applied
• Consolidation (saturated clay)
A slow process of squeezing water out of the
pores in soft clay when loaded
• Liquefaction (saturated sand)
Temporary loss of shear strength in loose sand
due to a rise in excess pore water pressure during
cyclic loading such as seismic
• Seismic Densification (dry/moist sand)
Densification of loose sand above the groundwater
level due to ground shaking

See this link for presentation on soils issues:

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs