Georgia Democrats join defense of health reform law

  • Follow Latest News

ATLANTA -- Georgia Democratic legislators from the House and Senate announced today they’ve joined 500 of their colleagues across the country in filing a brief in support of the federal health-reform law.

The federal law championed by President Barack Obama faces legal challenges over the constitutionality of requiring individuals to purchase health insurance if their employers or the government don’t provide it. Georgia is one of the states that initiated the challenge now awaiting a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Georgia Democrats stood shoulder to shoulder on the Capitol steps before reporters to announce their participation in the friend-of-the-court brief filed Friday by the Center for Constitutional Law in support of the Obama administration.

“We are sending a strong message today by signing this amicus -- friend of the court -- brief that more than 500 legislators support the constitutionality of this law,” said Sen. Nan Orrock, D-Atlanta.

The provisions of the law are popular with the public and needed, said Rep. Gloria Frazier, D-Hephzibah.

For instance, allowing small businesses to deduct the expense of premiums from income on their tax returns has an economic benefit, she said.

“If we do not have healthy workers, we do not have money coming into the state,” she said. “This is good for small businesses’ bottom line.”

The U.S. Supreme Court set aside three days for oral arguments in late March. Decisions from the nation’s highest court usually come many months afterward.

But Rep. Pat Gardner, D-Atlanta, said Georgia’s legislature should move quickly to pass a bill to create a statewide insurance exchange, one of the federal law’s requirements.

“If we have not passed a bill this session and (health reform) is upheld, we’ll be at the back of the line for federal grants for setting up our health exchange,” she said. “So, it has consequences.”

Conservatives stalled consideration of a health-exchange bill in last year’s legislative session by arguing that it would give the appearance

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Insider Information
Insider Information 01/13/12 - 01:28 pm
A few good things in

A few good things in thousands of pages of legislation doesn't negate the unconstitutionality of major chunks of it.

It's the classic argument... "Yes, he killed his wife, but look at all of the charitable things he did."

How many of those who signed the amicus brief actually read the law?

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs