SC man could be freed after murder conviction tossed

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:40 PM
Last updated 8:59 PM
  • Follow Crime & courts

COLUMBIA -- A pile of charred belongings. A few specks of blood. A shoe with traces of gasoline.

Bostick  Special

Those are a few of the pieces of circumstantial evidence used against Roger Bostick of Jasper County. The 58-year-old was put away in 2001 after a jury found him guilty of murdering his neighbor, Sarah Polite, in March of 1999.

On Monday the S.C. Supreme Court reversed Bostick’s conviction and a circuit court's 30-year sentence, a decision that could set him free by the end of the month.

Polite, the treasurer and secretary of her church, was 69 when she was found inside a burning home she had shared with her son Rudy in Pineland, S.C. An autopsy showed she had been bludgeoned but died from carbon monoxide from the fire. Firefighters had kicked in the back door and discovered her corpse and a blood-spattered briefcase in the kitchen.

The S.C. Attorney General has 15 days to petition for a rehearing, which spokesman Mark Plowden said Monday the office will do.

“If the Supreme Court's order stands, Mr. Bostick will go free,” said Plowden.

What then for Bostick, who will have spent nearly a decade of his life in prison?

"This isn’t about suing anybody. This is about justice for an individual," said the man’s attorney, chief appellate defender of the S.C. Commission on Indigent Defense Bob Dudek. "Suing somebody - that’s not even in (the) furthest back of anybody's mind."

In its 5-0 decision, the Supreme Court said prosecutors simply had not proven that Bostick was the killer. Given the unanimous vote, Dudek said it was unlikely the state would be granted a rehearing.

Two days after the murder, investigators had found a burn pile of Polite’s possessions at a neighboring house owned by Bostick’s mother. There were two sets of car keys, toenail clippers, pens, burned paper, a metal clasped ring of a purse, and a watch. Kerosene or diesel fuel had been fueled the fire.

But the court on Monday noted that Bostick had never been linked to the victim’s belongings or to the crime scene.

When Bostick’s shoes were examined, investigators found traces of gasoline, which was also the substance that was used to set Polite’s house on fire.

During his 2001 trial, the now-defunct Carolina Morning News reported that Bostick said the fuel on his shoes could have come from starting the fire at an oyster roast, burning brush on the family's 100-acre farm, or changing the fuel pump in his car the afternoon before the murder.

The newspaper had reported that Bostick’s attorney Russell Keep had described the blood found on his client’s clothing as, “microscopic, not visible to the naked eyes except under very close inspection.”

A DNA analysis to determine whether the blood on Bostick’s jeans matched Polite was inconclusive.

Reach Sarita Chourey at or (803) 727-4257

Comments (6) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Ushouldnthave 04/12/11 - 08:42 pm
I would think that DNA

I would think that DNA advances over the 10 years may make that blood identifiable now.

curly123053 04/13/11 - 07:56 am
It will be a shame if a

It will be a shame if a guilty man is set free in this case. Evidently the jury at the time saw him as being guilty. If he is not guilty then the state needs to re-open the investigation and find the right killer or killers....On another note, who ever wrote this article has no business being in the news business. The grammar in this story is pathetic to say the least. How these people get hired into these jobs and keep them with the bad use of words is beyond me. In more than one instance there are grammatorical errors, but now a days it's not politically correct to tell somebody of their poor writing. I hope they are not using newspapers in the schools anymore.

peonynut 04/13/11 - 09:13 am
Probably not enough of the

Probably not enough of the blood sample left to do a DNA test since it was "microscopic." This is the problem with circumstantial evidence and an over eager district attorney.

Jane18 04/13/11 - 09:34 am
I just don't know about this

I just don't know about this man and his attorney. Had I been sent to prison, and I was, and am innocent-----Yeah, I'd be suing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

dougk 04/13/11 - 10:32 am
Who you going sue, Jane. The

Who you going sue, Jane. The jury??

Sweet son
Sweet son 04/13/11 - 12:13 pm
Hey dougk, you always sue the

Hey dougk, you always sue the "govment" 'cause theys got plenty of money!

realitycheck09 04/14/11 - 01:02 pm
curly - would you rather a

curly - would you rather a guilty man go free or an innocent man stay in jail? I assure you this case would not be the first time a jury was wrong.

For me, I'd rather we set 1000 guilty men free than send a single person to jail who was wrongfully convicted.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs