Owners of abandoned Ga. properties facing fees

  • Follow Government

ATLANTA — Two metro Atlanta counties and several area municipalities have begun requiring owners of vacant properties to register and pay a fee.

Local governments said the registries are intended to deal with the collapsed housing market by locating the person or financial institution responsible for an abandoned structure. They said owners can then be required to fix shattered windows or mow the grass.

Fulton and DeKalb counties and the cities of Loganville, Riverdale and Powder Springs already have enacted ordinances. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Gwinnett County and Lawrenceville are considering similar legislation.

"We feel it's a detriment to our city," Mayor Ray Nunley of Loganville said. In January, Loganville city leaders adopted an ordinance requiring owners of vacant structures to register their properties with the city and pay a $100 annual fee.

Vacant properties are breeding grounds for crime, accidents and fires, and lower property values, other officials said.

"I think every local government's preference would be that those properties not be vacant," said Amy Henderson, spokeswoman for the Georgia Municipal Association. "Vacant properties affect the quality of life in your community and property values of surrounding properties, so cities obviously want to prevent or mitigate some of that."

DeKalb County's ordinance, approved in July, requires creditors to register foreclosed properties with the county and pay a $175 fee. The registry applies only to properties foreclosed on or after Oct. 27.

Violators face a $1,000-a-day fine. The fines, along with the $175 fee, are used to hire more code enforcement officers.

Not everyone agrees the fees are a good idea.

"It's a sign of desperation," Snellville Mayor Jerry Oberholtzer said. "It basically says we can't fix the problem, so we're going to live with it and try to make some money off it. That's socialism right there."

Comments

Crime Reports and Rewards TV

Property taxes have been proven by the National Taxpayers Union and several other private and government studies to CAUSE Urban Blight. Just when the Taxpayer saves up enough money to do those repairs they really want to do they have to give the money to the Tax users to pay a meter reader to deal crack and the tax collector to keep the $25,000 OFF the Brinks truck so it can disappear over a long 4 day holiday weekend. If one SHRED of accountability was asked of the tax users who falsify time cards, rip off the city to the tune of thousands ect. etc. there would be no need to take folks hard earned things and covert them to more money to waste with only the taxpayer accountable when the tax users screw up.

Emerydan

I've been advocating this for years now. I believe even a candidate for Augusta mayor advocated something similar to this last year. I've always found it odd that we penalize the property owner with higher taxes who makes improvements to his property and keeps it maintained, yet the slumlord who allows their properties to deteriote, bringing the whole neighborhood down around it gets off scott free, and we see from a previous article, many of them are not even pasying property taxes.
For one thing this ordinance will help the county keep track of who owns these properties so the tax assessor knows where to go to collect back taxes.
The modest $100 annual fee for an abandoned proprty will provide the revenue source to hire more code and inspections officers, which currently is woefully understaffed for a city the size of Augusta and with so many abandoned and derelict properties.
WE must do something to incentivize property maintainence and utilization and disincentivize blight.
Currently, the folks who keep their properties maintained are paying for those who don't. That needs to change.
Do I think this will ever happen in Augusta? Probably not, as the slumlord lobby has a stranglehold on city government. But maybe the reputable real-eastet folks will step forward and demand this, because these derelict blighted properties hurt their long term business.

clumber

The government can not collect the property taxes due, by what stretch of the imagination can they collect a "registration fee"?

Pericles

@Emerydan: The county already tracks the owner of every parcel of property; it's called the property deed, and it's held at the office of the Clerk of Superior Court. A property registry is simply one more way for the government to squeeze more revenue out of owners of real property. The City has all the tools it needs to address blighted property. Any revenue collected would come only from the folks who are already maintaining their property anyway. If an owner doesn't care enough about the property to maintain it correctly, what makes you think he or she will cough up an extra $100 and provide their contact information?

Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.
Loading...