Increase in 'fees' rankles Georgians

Monday, Jan. 3, 2011 4:48 PM
Last updated 7:07 PM
  • Follow Government

ATLANTA -- Opposition is growing against the increasing number of fees levied by the state that are supposed to pay for specific services but wind up in the general treasury.

Many critics say they're merely a tax increase dressed up to fool voters.
The practice of taking user fee money to shore up the rest of the state budget started more than a decade ago but has accelerated in recent years as the state grapples with declining income from taxes on sales and income.

In the last session, the General Assembly raised dozens of fees to help plug a budget hole, from drivers licenses to court filing. With next year's budget projected to have a nearly $2 billion shortfall, observers predict the fee swap-out will continue.

Officials with the Association County Commissioners of Georgia said Monday that they intend to take a public stance against future fees until the state stops its practice of redirecting the revenue collected from existing fees. Examples include fees on drunk-driving arrests for crime labs and on phone bills listed for 911 service even though none of the money winds up going to local emergency-dispatch services.

"The big issue here is when does a fee become a tax? Does it erode the public's trust in our state government to deliver the services ... when it's no more than a bait and switch?" asked Todd Edwards, associate legislative director for the association.

In many cases, local governments have to come up with the money to pay expenses that the fees were intended to cover, from health departments to legal defense for the poor.

In other cases, the services simply aren't provided by anyone. The state collected $17 million from a $1 tire fee intended to clean up old, illegal tire dumps, but less than $2 million went to actual cleanup. The rest went to shoring up the general budget while the Department of Natural Resources can't afford to remove 3 million tires dumped illegally in Upson County.

Environmental groups are angry, too, calling for a constitutional amendment that would limit fee revenue to the stated purpose.

 "It would allow the legislature to fund programs or get rid of them if they're not needed," said Neill Herring, lobbyist for the Sierra Club. "It wouldn't allow them to collect money and use it somewhere else. ... It would remove the bad odor of fees."

Comments (5)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
ReformedRepub
0
Points
ReformedRepub 01/03/11 - 06:11 pm
0
0

From diverting the money

From diverting the money collected for Social Security to the Federal budget for years to this. The Government from local to the top are nothing but thieves. Social security is owed so much by the government that it cannot be repaid, it's nothing but a huge Ponzie scheme. Gary Madoff will die in prison for it, yet our Senators and Representatives just keep getting richer. Good ole Sonny made out like a bandit, and now, look who's to be our Governor. BRILLIANT!-

Batman
16
Points
Batman 01/03/11 - 06:56 pm
0
0

Clearly all governments are

Clearly all governments are out of control and it's the people's responsibility to rein them in. The last election is encouraging and the reining in process may actually be underway. On a sad note, it appears to me that our public school systems, under federal mandate, have dumb down education to a point where we are graduating kids who don't accurately understand the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution along with The Federalist Papers should be exhaustively taught in our schools. Remember we are care takers of our U.S. Constitution and state constitutions. Politicians can't be trusted to govern honestly without the people's oversight.

ReformedRepub
0
Points
ReformedRepub 01/03/11 - 07:21 pm
0
0

The Federalist Papers are not

The Federalist Papers are not the only opinions written pertaining to the Constitution by the authors and signers of the Constitution, thus ALL opinions should be taught, not just the one that you approve of, Batman.
Also, they are only OPINIONS, thus have absolutely no relevance to the interpretation of the Constitution by today's scholars, judges and the Supreme Court. get out of the 1700s and come BACK TO THE FUTURE.

ReformedRepub
0
Points
ReformedRepub 01/03/11 - 07:23 pm
0
0

By the way,the "Federal

By the way,the "Federal Mandate" is NKLB, which is Bush's baby.

Batman
16
Points
Batman 01/03/11 - 09:11 pm
0
0

Thanks for confirming and

Thanks for confirming and reaffirming my position... it's much appreciated.

Back to Top

Loading...