Costly to store SRS shipment in Texas

  • Follow Latest News

A plan to temporarily store two trainloads of Savannah River Site's depleted uranium in Texas after it was rejected by Utah would cost at least $8 million more than leaving it in South Carolina.

The radioactive material, left over from decades of nuclear weapons production, was stored in 15,605 drums that were to be disposed of at an EnergySolutions waste site in Clive, Utah.

After the first shipment-5,408 drums-was sent to Utah in December, the state's governor protested further shipments. The Energy Department then idled two trainloads that remain at SRS and the Energy Department has proposed moving the material to a waste facility in Andrews, Texas, for interim storage.

That interim proposal would cost about $12 million, compared to a cost of $2 million to $4 million to simply maintain the material at SRS until an approved final destination can be arranged, according to a report presented this week to the SRS Citizens Advisory Board.

Currently, 56 loaded rail cars containing 5,776 drums remain at SRS, with an additional 3,616 drums in storage and awaiting transport, the report said, and an additional 805 drums are scheduled to be moved to Oak Ridge National Laboratory this summer.

On April 13, the Energy Department's Inspector General released a report critical of the Texas option, which "carries with it a number of significant logistical burdens, including substantial additional costs for repackaging at SRS, transportation to Texas, storage at the interim site, and, repackaging and transportation to the yet-to-be determined final disposition point."

No final decisions have been made on the disposition of the material, the report said.

Reach Rob Pavey at (706) 868-1222, ext. 119, or rob.pavey@augustachronicle.com

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Trey Enfantay
9
Points
Trey Enfantay 05/06/10 - 12:17 pm
0
0
Just dump those barrels on

Just dump those barrels on the gulf oil leak to plug it up.....

onecatfish
5
Points
onecatfish 05/06/10 - 03:07 pm
0
0
We should use you to plug the
Unpublished

We should use you to plug the oil well

Riverman1
86917
Points
Riverman1 05/06/10 - 03:33 pm
0
0
This is a federal problem and

This is a federal problem and it's up to them to find somewhere to store the wastes. It's getting crazy. Time for the feds to step up.

Little Lamb
46920
Points
Little Lamb 05/30/10 - 12:31 pm
0
0
Actually, Trey has a good

Actually, Trey has a good idea. They need to inject very dense material into the hole to offset the gas pressure in the leaking well. This stuff is about as dense at you can get. It would be perfect to force into the leaking formation. We could kill two birds with one material - - stop the oil leak and dispose of the uranium.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Democrats target turnout for Sunday voting

Registered voters in Augusta-Richmond County can cast ballots in the Nov. 4 election from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Sunday in the Advance Voting Center at Augusta Municipal Building, 530 Greene St.
Search Augusta jobs