S.C. House approves 50-cent cigarette tax increase

  • Follow Metro

COLUMBIA --- For the second time in two years, the South Carolina House agreed to a 50-cent increase in cigarette taxes Wednesday.

House leaders lost a fight to lower a proposed increase in the state's cigarette tax to 30 cents a pack instead of the 50 cents approved last week by the Senate.

"I thought at 30 cents the House was very likely to override the veto. I'm not sure at 50 cents," House Speaker Bobby Harrell said after the bill was sent back to the Senate.

South Carolina's cigarette tax is 7 cents a pack, the nation's lowest rate. The tax has been unchanged since 1977.

Gov. Mark Sanford has vowed to veto any cigarette tax increase that doesn't reduce some other tax.

The version heading back to the Senate generates $136 million. About $125 million of that goes to a new Medicaid trust fund, setting aside the cash to be used beginning in July 2011 to help fill what's expected to be a half-billion-dollar gap in what's needed to pay for health care for the elderly, disabled and poor when federal bailout cash disappears.

The measure also sets aside $5 million each for cancer research at the Medical University of South Carolina and smoking cessation programs and $1 million for agriculture marketing.

House members rejected the 30-cent-a-pack proposal that generated $87 million with a 62-53 vote after more than two hours of debate. Supporters argued the state needs the $125 million the legislation generates for Medicaid programs and the 30-cents proposal generated only about $87 million -- far short of patching the shortfall.

Rep. B.R. Skelton, R-Six Mile, said that when federal matching cash is included, the 50-cent increase generates more than $500 million, enough to cover the gap. Without it, Skelton said, the state's disabled and elderly will lose services and their families will be forced to quit jobs, work less and spend more time at home caring for their needs.

That's worse than the tax increase Republicans fear, Skelton said.

"Guess what? When you cut those services, you are imposing a cost increase on the people that are taking care of them," he said.

State Rep. Kris Crawford, a physician and Florence Republican, said he wouldn't mind losing a veto vote.

"I'll take one more year to be right," Crawford said. "You'll vote with me on a dollar next year" when there's desperation to plug the hole in Medicaid spending, he said.

Harrell said even the 50-cent increase isn't enough to patch Medicaid's looming shortfall.

The House made two changes to the bill: scrapping Senate plans to tap the state's national tobacco settlement fund for rural infrastructure projects along Interstate 95 and $1 million yearly for agricultural products marketing.

If the Senate agrees to those changes, the bill would go to Sanford.

Senate Acts on Trash, Drilling

WASTE ENERGY: Environmental groups and residents of Chester County said Wednesday that law changes to plans to allow a proposed garbage incinerator that will generate power will be an invitation to import trash from other states.

A Senate Medical Affairs panel took testimony on the legislation that New Jersey-based Covanta Energy Corp. said will help the facility make enough money to be profitable. The company wants the measure passed quickly so it has time to meet a 2013 deadline to qualify for federal energy tax breaks.

South Carolina limits landfills to handling no more than 600 tons of garbage daily. Covanta wants the limit raised to 1,600 tons because that's the amount it needs to generate profitably. It wants approval to buy unused daily capacity from other landfills.

OFFSHORE DRILLING: A bill directing South Carolina's environmental agency to speed up offshore drilling applications after federal restrictions are removed advanced to the full Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee. Sen. Paul Campbell, the panel's chairman, said it's largely a symbolic bill to welcome the offshore business, recognizing South Carolina will compete with other East Coast states.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
veggie-d
0
Points
veggie-d 04/21/10 - 08:53 pm
0
0
put a $10.00 a pack tax on'em

put a $10.00 a pack tax on'em and pay for health care with the money. except for smoke related illness...those people made a choice to kill themselves...let'em die from it...suicide is illegal, but smoking is not?...soooo, it's really that, instant suicide is illegal...a slooooooow painful, long, drawn out, cancerous death is not only legal but it's making billionaires out of the executioners/peddlers of death...why then is it NOT o.k. for the doctor kevorkians of the world to provide a swift and painless exit for those who so desire?...because they are not in bed with the greedy right wing lot that runs the tobacco industry!...smoking plays a very TAXING role on the nations health...so put it back on the smokers & their cigarettes. tax'em! tax'em! tax'em! all the way to the GRAVE!

goody
0
Points
goody 04/22/10 - 09:13 am
0
0
Taxation to force change in

Taxation to force change in behavior of others, should be and probably is unconstitutional! It's a shame they can't tax stupid. Just because you do not do something, doesn't mean that everyone who does should be taxed into compliance. They will get around to taxing your behavior sooner than you think.

Back to Top

Loading...