SC domestic-violence bills face hurdles

Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:12 PM
Last updated Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:05 AM
  • Follow Latest News

COLUMBIA -- Out of a dozen bills that address domestic violence pending in the S.C. General Assembly, advocates pointed to two today that have the best chances of passage.
Criminal Domestic Violence Study Committee members, Sens. Larry Martin, R-Pickens, and Gerald Malloy, D-Darlington, and Rep. Keith Kelly, R-Woodruff, heard from Vicki Bourus, who heads the S.C. Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Assault, and Laura Hudson, executive director of the S.C. Crime Victims' Council.

Bourus and Hudson pointed to S. 790, a bill introduced by Martin, that would create a permanent civil restraining order in cases where an abuser has finished his sentence and has returned to the community where the victim lives.

 
The advocates are also closely tracking S. 282, an amendment to a law that alerts an abuser that he is going to be arrested when a victim signs a warrant for his arrest. The current law creates inherent dangers for the victim, according to advocates. S. 282, sponsored by Sen. Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, and Sen. Robert Ford, D-Charleston, would exempt domestic violence and harassment from the courtesy-summons mandate.

The group also discussed Rep. Shannon Erickson's bill, H. 4198, that prevents insurance companies from treating a victim's past or present exposure to domestic violence as reason for declining a claim or increasing premiums.
Malloy said the bill has a serious flaw that absolves insurers.

Bourus told him they had worked closely with the industry on the bill.
Malloy responded, "Insurance companies are not going to end up objecting to that. ... Somebody is an attorney to put that kind of language in," added the senator.
While Bourus and Hudson said they haven't given up on the remaining proposals that have been introduced, they acknowledged Tuesday the legislation has not picked up much momentum.
Other proposals include: H. 3672, a bill to require a change of venue for a criminal case in which the accused batterer is a member of law enforcement or a judge; H. 3641, which requires police to note a CDV investigation on an incident report, even if there is no arrest; S. 266, which institutes dating-violence policies in schools. Last year Rep. Greg Delleney, R-Chester, amended the bill to exclude homosexual youths from protections.

Reach Sarita Chourey at sarita.chourey@morris.com or (803) 727-4257

Comments (2)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
marvincates
0
Points
marvincates 03/24/10 - 02:13 am
0
0

There should be no hurdles

There should be no hurdles for this bill to pass. If you are a wife beater you go to jail. Simple as that. That kind of violence leads to death of one or both of them. It should not have got this far. The coutrs should not have to legislate stupidity. But there you go.

justus4
93
Points
justus4 03/24/10 - 05:16 am
0
0

For those who believe that

Unpublished

For those who believe that "small goeverment" is best, sure got a strange way of showing it. This is the heavy hand of government and a "government takeover" of marriage problems. Where are the safeguards for men who are wrongfully charged by a wicked woman getting back at him for cheating? This bill goes too far and probably won't pass. Personal responsibility is an important factor when choosing a mate and government laws will never reduce that responsibility. It's already too easy to get trapped into this corrupt legal system and this bill would give women even more power...and no sane citizen believes violence ever helps.

Back to Top

Loading...