Amendment to boot Ga. tax cheats from office bogs down in committee

Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:00 PM
Last updated 9:18 PM
  • Follow Latest News

ATLANTA -- Ejecting elected officials from office for failing to pay their taxes may be popular, but the details are too complicated to win passage this year after the House Ethics Committee shelved a proposed constitutional amendment today.
"If that takes another year, so be it," said Chairman Joe Wilkinson, R-Atlanta.
The bipartisan proposal hit a snag over ensuring that it covered every possible situation that could inadvertently trip up a state or local official, such as a former business partner who stole the tax money instead of paying it.
"We certainly don't want anyone to get caught in that trap," said the author, Rep. Calvin Hill, R-Canton.
House Democratic Leader DuBose Porter reminded his colleagues on the committee that confusing wording or unintended results would be harder to fix next year with a simple bill, as is commonly done with routine legislation.
"I'm thinking of every case scenario that could happen," he said. "Y'all remember, we're putting this in the constitution. This is not something you can clean up real quick."
The tax issue arose last year when the Department of Revenue reported that about two-dozen members of the House and Senate had failed to pay their taxes. A bill quickly passed then that requires the department to warn legislators and then give their names to the House and Senate ethics committees.
This year, Wilkinson, said there remains one member of the House who never filed for taxes on earnings from 2008. Wilkinson wouldn't name the lawmaker but said he had met with him twice this week about the matter. Ultimately, the member could be punished once the committee is satisfied there are no excuses.
Another member came to the committee's attention, Wilkinson said, because of late filing. Once it began investigating, the committee learned that legislator's accountant had failed to note on the return that it was allowed an extra two months because of a state disaster declaration triggered by flooding in the lawmaker's area. That's the kind of situation that could lead to unnecessary embarrassment of a public official that the committee hopes to avoid.
The proposed constitutional amendment would have had to be approved by two-thirds of both the House and Senate and then a majority of voters in November. Wilkinson said it would be re-drafted for introduction next January for a second attempt then.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Bumm
0
Points
Bumm 03/23/10 - 10:37 pm
0
0
And do you actually think the

And do you actually think the elected officials would draft a law that would put their b---- in a wringer?

KSL
135554
Points
KSL 03/23/10 - 11:56 pm
0
0
A bunch of bs. He can file a

A bunch of bs. He can file a return and then file an amended return later. Total BS.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Grad rates show improvement by local school systems

Graduation rates in both Richmond and Columbia counties followed the statewide trend of slow and steady increases in 2014, although progress in individual schools varied greatly.
Search Augusta jobs