Ryberg, Sanford outline strategy to fight Yucca Mountain decision

Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2010 12:30 PM
Last updated 9:03 PM
  • Follow Latest News

COLUMBIA -- Republicans today criticized the Obama administration's decision to halt plans to make Yucca Mountain in Nevada a permanent nuclear waste storage facility, and outlined legal and legislative options to fight the administration's decision.
Gov. Mark Sanford threatened to take legal action against the federal government if the White House does not reverse its position by the end of the month. And Sen. Greg Ryberg, R-Aiken, said he plans to introduce legislation to divert payments flowing from the state to the federal government so that South Carolina can create a fund for its own waste-storage purposes.
"We have 30 years of science and probably millions of man hours and woman hours that have gone into the science of Yucca Mountain as a permanent depository," said Ryberg.
"We probably have 10 minutes in a poll that decided it wasn't good for the sitting (U.S. Senate) majority leader for Yucca Mountain to be pursued," he said, referring to Democratic Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada.
"The people of Aiken and neighboring counties have worked for decades at the Savannah River Site to assist the federal government while it developed Yucca Mountain," said Ryberg, adding that his resolution will end any future payments toward a permanent repository for the federal government, directing part of the money to a new state fund "to pay for a different permanent storage solution that we must obviously find for ourselves."
The press conference Tuesday included Republican U.S. Reps. Joe Wilson of the 2nd congressional district and Gresham Barrett of the 3rd district. Barrett was one of a handful of Republican candidates running for governor and other offices who attended the Tuesday press conference.
Reach Sarita Chourey at sarita.chourey@morris.com or (803) 727-4257

Comments (11)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
justus4
4
Points
justus4 02/16/10 - 02:21 pm
0
0
Riverman1
0
Points
Riverman1 02/16/10 - 03:53 pm
0
0

South Carolina has accepted

South Carolina has accepted nuclear wastes from all over the world for decades. Yucca Mt. was the solution that we all paid for in our electric bills for many years. It's flat out wrong to let Harry Reid shut down this billion dollar project.

Little Lamb
617
Points
Little Lamb 02/16/10 - 04:05 pm
0
0

RM is correct. Every

RM is correct. Every customer of a power company that has nuclear reactors has paid for disposal fees for at least the past 20 years. They money went directly to the federal government through electric bills, and they used it to pay Medicaid instead of putting the money into the waste repository. It's now time to refund the money via our electric bills.

KSL
566
Points
KSL 02/16/10 - 04:07 pm
0
0

Does Justus think Yucca

Does Justus think Yucca Mountain is in Arizona?

devgru1
0
Points
devgru1 02/16/10 - 10:24 pm
0
0

Justus4, Yucca Mountain is in

Justus4, Yucca Mountain is in Nevada. Lord please help us.

Petey Aitchess
0
Points
Petey Aitchess 02/17/10 - 05:50 am
0
0

justus - You win the prize.

justus - You win the prize. Now go sit in the corner with your new hat and be proud!

sTiCkMaN
0
Points
sTiCkMaN 02/17/10 - 07:02 am
0
0

i think the point of the

i think the point of the story is that...... if yucca mountain is closed or not usable then the whole idea of Obama saying he is going to give money for nuclear energy is a bunch of B.S. because you have to have somewhere to put the waste. 3 decades and a lot of money have been spent on yucca, it would be a waste not to use it. but then again, these are democrats we are talking about.

disssman
0
Points
disssman 02/17/10 - 08:23 am
0
0

Petey and riverman. As

Petey and riverman. As staunch advocates for "states rights" aren't you being a little hippocritical about Nevada not wanting trash from another state? Can't have it both ways, you either believe in states rights or you don't. Couldn't resist guys. Personally if they opened Yucca Flats it would probably improve the lives of folks that live within fifty miles of the place. Further, it would probably be the safest and most tested place on earth.

Petey Aitchess
0
Points
Petey Aitchess 02/17/10 - 08:36 am
0
0

dissman - I don't think so in

dissman - I don't think so in this case since it's a federal initiative that has received funding from affected states for many years (decades). This is one of the few things the federal government needs to oversee. They are empowered by the Constitution to oversee the dealings between the states. Not every state has the geological features to make such a project possible.

Petey Aitchess
0
Points
Petey Aitchess 02/17/10 - 08:39 am
0
0

If the authority to approve

If the authority to approve the construction of reactors was delegated to the state level, then we might have something to discuss. "You created it, you store/dispose of it". This program is entirely under the purview/oversight of the federal government (as it should be).

grinder48
3
Points
grinder48 02/17/10 - 01:16 pm
0
0

AZ NV CA NY WY etc they're

AZ NV CA NY WY etc they're all interchangeable, right? As devqur1 wrote, "Lord please help us."! At least sheds light on the level of credence that should be afforded the blather of justus4 in these forums.

Anonymous Heckler
0
Points
Anonymous Heckler 02/21/10 - 08:55 pm
0
0

Yuccca Mountain has been

Yuccca Mountain has been under research for decades. That's multiples of 10's for people that do not understand the concept of decades. For a government that wants to create jobs, put your money where you mouth is. I've worked in the nuclear industry. It's safe. To use a democrat word, 'you people' are ignorant. 'You people' being those against nuclear power.

Back to Top
Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1467/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1471/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1470/
  • title http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1468/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1465/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1462/
  • title http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1461/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1441/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1460/
Mayfest 2012
Loading...